「Purged」
AnonymousPOST DELETED BY 'admin'
POST PURGED BY 'admin' FOR "reisa"
POST PURGED BY 'admin' FOR "purge"
POST PURGED BY 'admin' FOR "reisa"
POST PURGED BY 'admin' FOR "purge"
What was in that? I'm interested now, we missed each other by literally a few minutes.
>>53860 #
I apologize about illya, he's a malicious jewish infiltrator.
https://imperiumpress.substack.com/p/the-third-world-is-going-to-cop-it-b9e
>If you look closely at demographic data worldwide, you’ll find something interesting: Europeans are not the only ones suffering birth rate collapse. In fact, the third world is in worse trouble than we are, and demographic trends will look very different by the end of this century than they do now.
>Liberalism hurts us, but it also hurts non-whites and that is also a tragedy. If we look at the data, we have every reason to think that European peoples will enjoy a demographic comparative advantage soon. Great news for us, but it would be a shame to lose the richness of the different peoples of the world, and by working to blot out liberalism everywhere, we help everyone. This is a powerful framing, so keep it in mind as you read on.
>I spoke in an earlier article of the Mithridates Strategy—asymmetric warfare under the illusion of formal equality. Think of that scene in The Princess Bride where two characters drink the poison but only one is immune. The emergent ethnic strategy of the West is to accustom itself to the poison of liberalism, first in its immature form (the aristocratic liberalism of the 19th century), and to build up a certain tolerance to it as it matures. It then exports the poison in its concentrated form (civil rights, liberty, capitalism, etc.) to other societies who have no evolved defense mechanisms. We have given the smallpox blanket of democracy, rule of law, and human rights to the third world, and the data are only now starting to come back—things are not looking good for them. Let’s dig into the numbers.
>What’s happening globally is quite simple—peoples whose culture and folkways have never had so much as a whiff of materialism, individualism, and liberty are coming in contact with 100% proof, high-test, late-stage liberalism, and they are getting piledriven by it like a welterweight Funko Pop collector by Dan Severn in his prime. Not only is it not a fair fight, it’s grotesque and cruel, like kicking a puppy. These people are defenseless. Liberalism seems to have especially buck broken societies with universalist religions, even tribal societies like Afghanistan, which 20 years ago averaged 7.5 children per woman but which would hit zero births within about two centuries at the current rate of decline. Some religions like Hinduism, particularly those denominations which are more traditionalist and clannish, have fared better, despite that Indian TFR has been suppressed by government campaigns since the 1970s, and despite that 37% of Indian women of childbearing age are sterilized.14
>Whites, specifically northwestern Europeans, have also fared better. America, despite the cratering fertility of its minorities, would achieve zero births in about 300 years given current trends,15 mostly on the strength of its white population’s relatively stable TFR, centuries after many third world countries would reach zero births.16 However, whites have fared better for very different reasons than Hindus.
>Like Mithridates himself, we have been exposed to the poison of liberalism for a long time, and have built up a tolerance to it. We, particularly Germanic and Celtic descended Europeans, have undergone a ruthless selection process. For decades, even centuries now, we have been under extreme Darwinian conditions that have excluded from the breeding pool those individuals who engage in race-mixing, homosexuality, careerism, materialism, and sense-gratification. Whites today have passed through a crucible that is still going, in fact, reaching a fever pitch—this is part of why you have seen the rise of a genuine illiberal movement in the alt right. And our descendants will be fitter and less liberal still than us. Our ethnic competitors are going up in a puff of smoke. This is not something to be celebrated, it is a tragedy. Multiculturalism, liberalism, universalism, and other viral, entropic belief systems will kill off cultures that, although they have taken advantage of our hospitality, are in some cases still noble and deserve a place on this earth—in their own backyard.
Whites WILL breed and our fertility WILL skyrocket and we WILL take over the world through sheer numbers and there is NOTHING jews nor jeets can do about it. Loser incels and faggots are an enemy to the White race. Might makes right. If you don't breed, then your genes do not deserve to survive.
>>53865 #
It's quite strange, but you can still have a conversation even in a deleted thread. I'd like to continue the discussion here if you're genuinely interested. But not instantly.
>>53903 #
This is about the future of the white race, so of course I'm interested. It's a shame /homu/ and /xomy/ are extremely anti-natalist death cults and censor any suggestion that white birth rates might skyrocket in a couple of generations. Lots of people there, like shiki, worship at the altar of pentti linkola's brand of ecofascism and view white genocide as unavoidable collateral damage. My guess is that most of them have severe mental problems (shiki's are confirmed) and have a strong desire to kill themselves and want to drag everybody else down with them, like crabs in a bucket. I also suggest reading this: https://www.unz.com/akarlin/breeders-revenge/
>>53942 #
Well, at this point I would like to shift the trajectory of our dialogue away from political populism and toward philosophical reflection—speaking not about means, but about ends.
So, you are worthy not just because you are white, you also have to prove your superiority. Heh.
>Might makes right
Hell yes, this does echo >>50660 ➡ # :
>Let the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force
But only at first glance. The words may sound similar, yet they carry different meanings.
What is at stake here is physical and intellectual-spiritual evolution, with fundamentally different outcomes.
You are speaking, in essence, about reproduction for the sake of reproduction.
The increase of physical mass on Earth may create certain conditions, but it is not an end in itself and, in any case, is characteristic of lower, animal impulses.
Yes, I believe that reproduction is a privilege of the best — among other things, in the physical sense as well. A healthy body hosts a healthy spirit, as we say; this gives hope for the emergence of Talents.
But this is a sacrifice of the present time for the sake of investing in the future. “Someone makes of himself a bridge over which the Übermensch will one day pass”, as Zarathustra said.
I am not opposed to people who devote themselves to arranging the future, but in doing so they sacrifice their present. This is the path and the choice of ordinary people; it is normal. They may be right, but they cannot be us. They merely prepare the road for the Higher, without being it themselves.
For “us,” however — the otherworldly ones, “yearning for the heavenly Homeland,” who have existed in all times and cultures — there is simply no alternative but to live “as if every day were the last”…
To clarify what I mean, at this point I would like to insert a post that was reflected upon a couple of years ago, and let this random phrase serve as the door to my narrative…
The justification of the door — Preserve me from carnal love.
Beyond the door, the base — A protocol for exposing the illusion of ecstasy.
A control phrase for stepping forward —“But I’m giving — and he isn’t taking!”
[ From cardiogram to sine wave: a report
“On love, through the eyes of a schizoid” ]
An analysis of this type of relationship from the standpoint of two positions:
(I will note in advance: we are speaking of a state whose outcome was ourselves,
and which, in its healthy form, is meant to generate subsequent generations as well.
This report is not a biological, psychological, or anthropological description —
for those, I kindly refer you to the appropriate institutions.
What you have before you is philosophy: reflection, personal experience, and observation.)
Defining the segments: I will begin with the positive aspects.
Function: and, standing in for Zarathustra, as some person of art once said —
> love as responsibility for life, including new life
— Love creates life.
It is known now, as it always has been, that with it a person blossoms (physically).
I myself sank into this swamp over the course of the past year.
Observing this effect in myself and noticing it in others,
I even caught myself entertaining the assumption
—that people who have not fully encountered the phenomenon
tend, as a rule, to be unpleasant in appearance — rather than the other way around.— (Perhaps this is prejudice, of course, but even conditionally speaking,it does serve as decent motivation to brush one’s teeth once moreand put on a clean shirt.)
When all aspects of this motivation are gathered into a single whole,
we return again to the same function — the creation (maintenance) of life.
Life — both one’s own and the unconsciously presumed subsequent one;
or put differently — one’s own life, for the sake of the subsequent.
Notably, the normie (the average person) requires no additional explanations
or functional breakdowns here — which is entirely logical:
most people are integrated into this vector of movement
in an unconsciously harmonious way.
[ The Path of Flesh ]
Love is the soundest path — for those to whom flesh matters more than essence.
I would rather not invoke such dubious terms as chakras at all,
but purely as a visual metaphor,
I will allow myself to mention the second chakra — svadhisthana,
legend has it located below the navel and above the perineum,
— and responsible simultaneously for sexual energy and money,
thus clearly demonstrating the nature of the phenomenon in question:
material advancement.
It would be wrong to say that success is impossible along this path
(temporarily setting aside the fact of human mortality);
for the average person — as for a cow — it is a fundamental base.
But viewed from the outside, it is walking from one wall to another.
Yes, within this movement — births for the sake of births —
knowledge is accumulated and transmitted across generations;
however, for the majority, “science” means little more
than figuring out how to stuff the belly fuller.
And so, gradually, our movement arrives at the second position:
— Such love denies texts that extend beyond the plane of the stomach.
It denies any concept of thought other than
“life for the sake of life”.
[ The Path of Thought ]
This could also be called a “spiritual path,”
but I would rather not appeal to the notion of spirituality,
which inevitably associates itself with faith in nonexistent things.
For contrast, however — try to find me a prophet who was a womanizer.
What you will always find instead are outcasts
for whom the construction of thought itself is meaning.
I do not exclude the possibility that their Love
is far greater than all of this,
and for me remains a secret —
but this is clearly, forgive me, not about that.
Even now, monasteries still exist, sacred deserts,
where people, freeing themselves from carnal love,
seek salvation in service.
Or, in my interpretation — in tuning into a radio frequency.
ReturnCatalogTopLast 100Locked to bottom