>>104366 #
have you seen them already?

>>104368 #
No.

>>104369 #
I'm going to consult chatGPjeet (the antichrist)
if the reviews are worse I'm probably gonna pass

>>104371 #
If my memory is correct it's a cult film for a good reason. I keep confusing Neil Marshall with Mark Neveldine though. I also might be confusing Dog Soldiers with another cult film where rabid zombie dogs attack entrapped soldiers.

>>104370 #
>chatGPjeet
Reception comparison (focusing on critics and general audience views, since these are low-budget Christian films with limited mainstream reviews):

The original (2000) was poorly received overall. It has a 14% critics score on Rotten Tomatoes (based on available reviews calling it slow, implausible, with poor production values and acting). On IMDb, it holds a 4.4/10 user rating from over 11,000 votes. It was seen as cheesy and low-quality, even by some sympathetic Christian reviewers.

Left Behind II: Tribulation Force (2002) generally had better reception than the first. Audience scores on Rotten Tomatoes sit around 67% (from thousands of ratings), notably higher than the original's audience score (~56%). Some reviews noted improvements in character development, pacing, and acting (Kirk Cameron reportedly stepped up his performance). Certain Christian outlets called it an upgrade over the first film, with more focus on story and less on setup.

Left Behind: World at War (2005) also fared better than the original in many opinions. It lacks a formal critics Tomatometer (very few reviews), but audience/popcornmeter is around 67% on Rotten Tomatoes. Reviews (including from Christianity Today and others) praised it as the strongest entry: better acting, more intrigue, decent effects for the budget, and a more action-oriented feel (some compared it favorably to shows like 24 with added prayer). It was called an "all-around better effort" than the prior films by some critics.

>>104372 #
From what I pulled up researching it should be pretty good

>>104373 #
Any terrible movies from before 2008 is better than any modern slop, you should know this.

>>104377 #
I do, was just curious about the review scores

>>104379 #
Those reviews are obviously relative. I would have mocked Left Behind the same way back then for exactly the same reasons, because compared to everything else, it was bad. But compared to media today, it's much better.

Dog Soldiers timer
syncwatch

Shiki should be here for this movie to complain about the scots. Larper.

>earing
gay

>opening with a sex scene between anglos
This is anti heterosexuality.

not much of a soldier was he

It's the blonde guy from Rome.

There's this characteristic sheen and glisten you always see on male actors in pre-digital films that never seems to be replicated today.

>L85
lmao

>>104402 #
based

>>104402 #
is that the guun

>>104404 #
yes.

>don't fug her in the butt

>>104394 #
Shiki doesn't watch the prolefeed with the pleb hordes.

>>104407 #
my theory is that Shi-Ki is not very good at making jokes, he is too wordy and cerebral and would be a bad movie poster, he knows this also.

>>104408 #
Best theory yet.

Also, shiki has gotten way less fun now that he's boomermaxing.

>>104410 #
He's a workaholic chasing cash that's inflating away. I bet he pays taxes too.

>>104411 #
I told him to put his cash into an index fund at the very least and he was quiet. He wants to suffer so he pretend he's a saint or something dumb.

>>104412 #
>He wants to suffer so he pretend he's a saint or something dumb.
Catholicism plus aping the protestant work ethic to try to be english. He's a retard.

>>104412 #
or maybe he's doing just that but doesn't want to lose street cred here

>>104415 #
I'm losing less money by day laboring than shiki working full time for glowies committing evil. He could at least put it in an index fund.

that scared the shit out of me lmao

finally something happened

already better than any "horror" movie in the last 10 years

I can't wait for the bad wulf CGI.

looooooool

arf

idk where this is filmed but I want to live in those woods foreber

I only paid attention to see if this was the film I remembered and no, it wasn't.

>>104433 #
I assume it's filmed on location in scotland.

I don't remember the thot. How disappointing.

all the yelps and awooooos really put it into camp territory, somehow the actors take their roles very seriously. they are professionals.

>>104436 #
>there is a woman in my anglo boys movie

>>104438 #
women take the fun out of everything except seggs

The FAL is a cool gun tbh.

So the wulves people or animals?

>aren't you guys going to gangrape me now?

LAAAMOOOOO THE DOG

the centurion guy looks like wojak

>>104445 #
billions must awoo

she wants to be fucked by werewolves

>only halfway thru the movie

Lol mp5s are hueg

this mobie has big bonk energy

is lassie a double agent

proper brootal

How the hell is that guy up and moving around

>>104466 #
He lost a lot of blood but you can survive having your intestines ripped out... until you eat the next day

>>104468 #
you're not going to be swinging fire logs at werewolves

being a wulf must be hell on your wardrobe

>>104469 #
A military sergeant will be

ah okay well that explains it

>>104471 #
he's a werewolf sargeant now

>canon

>being nice to women will get you nowhere
jej

I don't remember half of this movie. Must have been drunk the last 3 times we watched it

>it's that time of the month
jej

>remastered bluray
jej

>nooo stupid human, that's my fine china

>shooting out the floor
wow underworld literally stole that from this movie probably lmao

bonking

that is a doggone long movie

>>104488 #
#tomato

Thankie for watching.

9.5 out of 10
definitely a hidden gem

back to the xitterslop thread

>>104495 #
dum